<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Moviefone News</title>
<link rel="alternate" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/feeds/verticals/tv/index.xml" type="text/html"/>
<description>Moviefone</description>

<rights>Copyright 2011, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.</rights>
<subtitle>Moviefone</subtitle>
<generator>Good old fashioned elbow grease.</generator><item>
<title><![CDATA[Shoe Fashion Week To Launch in September]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/shoe-fashion-week-to-laun_b_1706799.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/shoe-fashion-week-to-laun_b_1706799.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/shoe-fashion-week-to-laun_b_1706799.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[The luxury footwear space just got a little bit more social. <a href="http://shoeweek.onsugar.com/" target="_hplink">Shoe Fashion Week</a>, which launches in September during the thick of NYFW SS 2013, celebrates the luxury shoe market in fashion week form with an emphasis on social media. The focus of the event will be on top designers and fashion houses in the space, but it also sets up the proper scope for traditional and new media interviews as well as live cameras, creating an interactive experience. "We want to build features and narrative media designed to show off accessories and the designers and heritage behind," said Paul Farkas, co-founder of Shoe Fashion Week. "We'll be featuring shoes, handbags, and accessories as they flow." Farkas, who is also CEO of <a href="http://socialtv.com/" target="_hplink">Social TV</a>, gets both luxury brands and social campaigns. Parallel to the event, Style Socialite Club with <a href="http://shoeweek.com/" target="_hplink">SocialiteClub.com</a> is also launching. "(I'm) very into real-time transmedia so can't wait to push digital envelope."<br />
<br />
What goes into a luxury footwear fashion week? "Key events are our luxury Shoe Fashion Show, Handbag and Shoe Lounge, Style Media House, and designer Sneaker Concert," offers Farkas. "In addition to trends, we understand that brand heritage, cultural milestones and adoration, and creative enlightenment should be explored, highlighted and awarded in the luxury footwear space and accompanying accessories market. We are producing our Runway Shows and Exhibitions featuring luxury shoes at its core, from our careful designer curation, to Strutway and Accessories Cam, and accompanying narrative media."<br />
<br />
And then of course there are celebrities. One cannot have luxury footwear without the celebrities and their brand associations. "Beyond the high fashion buy-in, an early remarkable sign for Shoe Week is the cultural bridge that is forming between the celebrities attached and their respective affinity toward luxury shoes and high sportswear," adds Farkas.]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:24:25 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>1706799</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Why We Need A 'Trumper' Movement]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/why-we-need-a-trumper-movement_b_1556973.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/why-we-need-a-trumper-movement_b_1556973.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/why-we-need-a-trumper-movement_b_1556973.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Is Donald Trump actually a human being?<br />
<br />
It has been widely joked in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/books/review/BuckleyC.t.html?_r=1" target="_hplink">certain media circles</a> that Donald Trump is in fact a short-fingered vulgarian. I would endeavor to attempt to argue in this essay that Donald Trump is, in fact, a long-fingered, mischievous form of macaque intent upon bringing about the destruction of the human race!<br />
<br />
You think I jest. I mean, how do we really know that Donald Trump is in fact a man and not something altogether feral that thinks it is a man but really isn't? We assume much about Trump's alleged humanity when his behavior speaks to something quite other than <a href="http://jahanbegloo.com/articles/fidelio.html" target="_hplink">the community of man</a>. He boasts of picking up pennies!  And where, pray tell, is Donald Trump's certificate of humanity? I demand that The Donald submit to a DNA test so that we can confirm or deny once and for all the proper sequencing of his chromosomes. How can we be sure he is in fact not a quadruped with an amazing sense of balance? My arguments:<br />
<br />
<ul><li><p><em>The hair.</em> This blogger's detractors will argue that in bringing up <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/shocking-truth-behind-donald-trumps-hair-revealed" target="_hplink">Donald Trump's unruly mane</a>, I am grasping at low-hanging comedic fruit. In fact, you will see, as this line of argument gathers steam, that it is not this blogger grasping at what's easy; it is The Donald grasping at highly situated bananas on a precarious branch. If Donald Trump is in fact a macaque or some other higher ape pretending to be a human, imagine the ambition. Every day it balances itself on its own hindquarters! It has put its damned, dirty, ape name on our skylines; it has polluted and befouled our politics at its highest levels!</p><p>Human beings quite simply don't have hair that behaves in the manner that Donald Trump's hair behaves, with the possible exception of Rudy Giuliani (and this blogger, quite frankly, has his lingering doubts about <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2008/01/schadenfrudy-giggliani-corsair-never.html" target="_hplink">Rudy's citizenship in the family of Man</a>, as well). Certain members of the great ape family do, but not Man, QED.</p></li><br />
<br />
<li><p><em>Apes throw their own feces.</em> And what is it, pray tell, that Donald Trump does in our commons? <a href="http://articles.philly.com/1993-11-25/living/25946840_1_donald-trump-alexandra-ripley-benefit-album" target="_hplink">Witness</a>: "The big question is: What does John Jr. see in Daryl [Hannah], if anything. I have seen her on many occasions, and she is, quite simply, a 'six' -- and badly in need of a shower or a bath." Do human beings above the age of 7 actually talk like this? It comes from a boiling Freudian id, clearly. But the boiling, rancid id of what species? I would argue a macaque; an orangutang probably wouldn't be an outlandish guess, either.</p><p>If that isn't an instance of tossing one's feces in public, witness <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2012/03/rosie-odonnell-cancellation-donald-trump.html" target="_hplink">this</a> regarding Rosie O'Donnell: "Rosie fails at everything. She had a variety show, it failed. I mean, she -- I don't understand now, somebody else, some moron will come and hire her again to do something else and that will fail." Again, this is violence toward a woman, behavior only tolerated in the animal kingdom and in <a href="http://www.rferl.org/content/Despite_Official_Measures_Bride_Kidnapping_Endemic_In_Chechnya/2197575.html" target="_hplink">some unfortunate parts of the former Soviet Empire</a>. Further, one cannot help but note that an alarming number of Donald Trump's wives belong to countries in the nimbus of the former Soviet Empire. Just saying. Moving right along.</p></li><br />
<br />
<li><p><em>Apes mock charge.</em> And what is it, pray tell, that Donald Trump does when he frequently runs pseudo-presidential campaigns? The sheer animal spectacle of it all! Public radio-show host and former <em>Spy</em> founder Kurt Andersen, one of the best contemporary social philosophers of our time, <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2011/04/kurt-andersen-on-donald-trump-amazing.html" target="_hplink">said on New York's WNYC</a> last year of Trump and his latest "mock charge":</p><p><blockquote>What will his excuse be if he says, "I've decided not to run"? ... The boy can cry wolf only so many times. So, he has done this again and again and again. I mean, sometimes he does it as a kind of left-wing Democrat saying that we have to have universal health care, and George Bush is the worst president in history, what he said a few years ago, and now he says it as, <em>I love the Tea Party, and I don't believe he was born in this country, and he's the worst president in history.</em> So it's an amazing spectacle. He is an amazing spectacle, which is why I guess I've been a sort of a student of Donald Trump for I guess these 25 years.</blockquote></p><p>To be a student of Donald Trump, to be sure, is to be a student of the family of the great apes. More zoology than sociology, this blogger would argue.</p></li></ul><br />
<br />
What is to be done? First: Join the revolution! Do not let Trump, some exotic and very dangerous form of great ape, bring about the downfall of man. Do not let him and his taxonomic family <a href="http://www.ballardian.com/images/statue_planet.jpg" target="_hplink">do this</a> to the Statue of Liberty. Huddled masses of the world, rise up!<br />
<br />
The blogger believes that the #Trumper hashtag should be used, liberally, for Tweeters who have serious and enduring doubts as to whether or not Donald Trump is actually a human being. The monkey revolution is in full effect, and Donald Trump is their mischievous Monkey King. Let this blog post be the herald that rouses mankind from its slumber. <br />
<br />
I am, until the time as this matter gets resolved in the court of public opinion,<br />
<br />
Yours,<br />
<br />
Ron Mwangaguhunga,<br />
President and CEO,<br />
The Trumper Movement]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>1556973</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[What If Ron Paul Wins The Iowa Caucus?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/what-if-ron-paul-wins-the_b_1134803.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/what-if-ron-paul-wins-the_b_1134803.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/what-if-ron-paul-wins-the_b_1134803.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul's PAC recently started pushing the results of a <a href="http://www.revolutionpac.com/2011/11/new-iowa-poll-places-ron-paul-firmly-in-first-with-25/" target="_hplink">commissioned poll</a> saying that their man is now in the lead in the Iowa. In the poll, Paul has 22 percent of support among Iowans while Romney is at 17 percent in the Hawkeye state. Earlier this month<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-15/romney-two-way-race-is-now-four-way-republican-dead-heat-in-iowa-caucuses.html" target="_hplink"> a Bloomberg poll</a> found Ron Paul in the top tier in Iowa. Nearly everyone in the field has gotten a chance to be a GOP frontrunner -- sorry Huntsman, sorry Santorum. So why shouldn't Paul get his 15 minutes on the revolving carousel after Trump, Bachmann, Perry, Cain and now Newt?</p> <br />
<br />
<p>It is not inconceivable that Ron Paul's timing -- his campaign <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/us/politics/ron-paul-gaining-momentumfrom-<br />
niche-voters-in-iowa-polls.html" target="_hplink">upsurge </a>-- has the good fortune of reaching its peak just as the Iowa straw caucus poll begins and all the other not-Romney wannabes have fallen. There is, one cannot fail to note, a "felt need" within the party for anyone other than Romney that is so strong it would to consider an astonishing buffoon like Herman<br />
Cain. Ron Paul, though at times he can appear a bit <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oSmneHSBf4Y/S9X7orka_hI/AAAAAAAAAEI/jIXi3qChK2k/s1600/Mr%2520Magoo.jpg" target="_hplink">Magooish</a>, is not Herman Cain. That having been said, I fully expect Mitt Romney to win the GOP nomination. Mitt Romney<br />
is making the fewest mistakes; Mitt Romney is a solid debater; Mitt Romney -- and this is<br />
my most important point -- has, quite simply, the best hair. It's a truly fucking awesome<br />
head of hair, graying at the temples just as it ought. Romney is quite frankly good at<br />
projecting an image of inevitability, of quiet competence. It is impossible, however, to<br />
ignore entirely that telling 25% ceiling that his campaign cannot seem to crack no matter<br />
how "competent" his projected surface. Mitt, who knows that numbers don't lie, would<br />
understand my skepticism here. A quarter of Republican support is a fragile house upon<br />
which to build an American Presidency.</p> <br />
<br />
<p>It has been said that with regards to elections, Democrats fall in love and Republicans fall in<br />
line. Another extreme oversimplification coming right up: the Dems are the "Mommy Party"<br />
-- concerned with education, healthcare, human rights. The Reps are the "Daddy Party" -- all<br />
fiscal discipline and national security, rigid and hierarchical (and they don't ask for<br />
directions). It is, in GOP terms, by the logic of hierarchy, Mitt's turn by virtue of the fact that<br />
he won the silver medal in 2008, just like it was McCain's turn in 2008 because he got the<br />
silver back in 2004. Fair play and all that; it's all very white of them.</p> <br />
<br />
<p>In my guestimation the GOP primary ultimately plays out something like this: Romney<br />
makes it into the top tier in Iowa, maybe third, quite possibly second -- no big deal, as he<br />
has lowered expectations already -- and then wins New Hampshire. New Hampshire is the<br />
key to Mitt's campaign, the place where the Team Romney makes its stand. I wouldn't be<br />
surprised that someone as -- how does one say this? -- calculating as Mitt Romney didn't<br />
think of Wolfboro for a second home because of the added bonus of the Presidential<br />
campaign calendar. New Hampshire is also where, in all likelihood, another Mormon on the<br />
trail, Jon Huntsman, will make his concession speech saying that he would never have<br />
forgiven himself if he didn't give it a try. Mitt Romney has <a href="http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/here-romneys-just-one-of-the-crowd?SESS7097f74c95c359c2514cc9a3a4afba4c=google&amp;page=full" target="_hplink">an 11 acre estate in Wolfeboro</a>, was Governor of neighboring Massachusetts (most of the New Hampshire population lives in the Boston media market) and is thus a known quality in the state.</p> <br />
<br />
<p>Next up: the South. Romney will lose South Carolina GOP primary, because he is simply not<br />
conservative enough and because he is not Christian enough. At around that time Mitt will<br />
be rolling out a shitload of endorsements - those carefully cultivated IOUs that he has kept<br />
close to his chest. Those will minimize the blow, make him look inevitable even while he is<br />
having his ass handed to him south of the Mason-Dixon line. That steady stream of<br />
endorsements will jettison Mitt <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/fl/florida_republican_presidential_primary-1597.html" target="_hplink">into Florida</a> at the end of January and give him just the<br />
right kind of momentum into Super Tuesday. The endorsements -- from party<br />
superheavyweights like <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65805.html" target="_hplink">Jebby</a> and <a href="http://race42012.com/2011/11/13/christie-to-be-mitt-romneys-bodyguard-in-presidential-race/" target="_hplink">Chris Chrystie</a> -- and the great money advantage should put him over. This is all good so as long as Ron Paul doesn't win Iowa. In that event all theoretical<br />
bets are off.</p> <br />
<br />
<p>So I ask -- what if Ron Paul happened to win Iowa. It is not an inconceivable event, not<br />
beyond the realm of possibility anyway. Ron Paul's support in Iowa has always been above<br />
a respectable 10%. Paul is, however, starting to surge in the run up. And, curiously, Mitt<br />
Romney may be noticing. Even as President Obama was making his <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/obamas-weekly-address-asia-pacific-region-vital-to-us-economic-growth/" target="_hplink">historic trans-Pacific pivot</a>, Romney, on a far<br />
less grand geopolitical scale, was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/us/politics/mitt-romney-shifts-in-iowa-playing-to-win-quickly.html?pagewanted=all" target="_hplink">pivoting to compete in Iowa.</a> Does<br />
"Mittens," as Rachel Maddow so un-affectionately calls him, want to put this thing away with a<br />
quick one-two combination punch in Iowa, then New Hampshire? Is Romney worried that a<br />
surging Ron Paul might win in Iowa, thus radically boosting Team Paul's chances in also<br />
taking New Hampshire, a state perfectly tailored to Ron Paul's libertarianism, a state that<br />
happens to love the art of the political comeback? Remember Pat Buchanan, another<br />
arguably loveable paleoconservative "outsider" in the Granite state in 1992?</p> <br />
<br />
<p>Were Ron Paul to win Iowa, he would definitely alter the dynamics of the primary race in<br />
New Hampshire, a key state for Mitt Romney. Were Ron Paul to win Iowa and then, quite<br />
possibly, New Hampshire as well, Mitt Romney would be headed down South -- enemy<br />
territory -- and would not reach his allies in Florida until January's end. And what if Ron<br />
Paul's paleoconservatism and his momentum were enough to win him South Carolina, the<br />
hat trick? Then Mitt Romney, allies in Florida or not, would be very, very fucked. And<br />
the big winners of such a scenario - not so very far-fetched -- would be Ron Paul.</p> <br />
<br />
<p>And, of course, President Barack Obama. </p> <br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:39:21 EST</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>1134803</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Fashion Week: Navigating Old and New Media]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/navigating-old-and-new-fa_b_960233.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/navigating-old-and-new-fa_b_960233.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/navigating-old-and-new-fa_b_960233.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Over the years <a href="http://emediavitals.com/content/glamourcom-tumblr-embrace-fashion-bloggers" target="_hplink">I have argued</a>, strenuously, against the prevailing wind that blogs, the act of blogging and bloggers have never "died" a media death. Ironically, it is <em>The Observer</em> itself, which earlier in the year championed the idea of <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/tech/end-blogging" target="_hplink">the death of blogging</a>, that has changed editorship altogether -- and now relies greatly on the talent of blogger/reporters. <em>Charmed</em>, I'm sure.<br />
<br />
The pendulum swings. The new dawn beckons. Blogs have evolved, now occupying important niches, providing very specific information enthusiastically. And bloggers themselves -- the more prominent ones, at least -- have developed organic relationships with traditional media sources at the top of the old media food chain. It was, perhaps, inevitable; not so much a changing of the guard as an integration of the new. <br />
<br />
Traditional media -- particularly in fashion, which is what we are talking about here -- has money and prestige. New media, on the other side of the equation, has a youthful audience as well as an intuitive understanding of the way forward. Kimmie Smith, named one of the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/cosmopolitan-magazine-names-kimmie-smith-kitten-lounge-1-113211424.html" target="_hplink">10 Hottest Bloggers</a> in <em>Cosmopolitan</em>'s Blogger Network, is such a blogger, and has developed such a relationship with a prestigious old media brand. <br />
<br />
Smith, the editor-in-chief and founder of <a href="http://kittenlounge.onsugar.com/" target="_hplink">Kitten Lounge</a>, chatted with me recently via Gmail, "Back in 2004 which is when I started, I was modeling and styling in my down time I would write about a number of accessories that I was wearing in my shoots or putting on clients. I was approached by a company to become an Editor of See Pretty Things which was all about accessories and then in 2007, I launched Kitten Lounge as I wanted my sense of style to be balanced by a lifestyle approach."<br />
<br />
The <em>Cosmo</em> Blogger Network launched in the magazine's September issue -- the most important month of the calendar for glossies. "I will be featured throughout the year on various projects. Definitely check out the October issue to see something super exciting. It will definitely be a mixture of a number of things love that the network is about partnering with them and vice versa."<br />
<br />
The <em>Cosmo</em> Blogger Network involved a photo shoot, a video as well as collaboration with the magazine. As Kimmie describes it via Gmail, she worked as "partners between the magazine, (their) brand and also my personal brand." Collaborations between bloggers and legacy media fashion glossies are increasing. In February, for example, <a href="http://emediavitals.com/content/glamourcom-tumblr-embrace-fashion-bloggers" target="_hplink">Glamour embraced</a> seventeen personal style bloggers from around the world for their "Young and Posh Bloggers Network." It is another example of audience exchange, the conferring of prestige on the next generation as well as fresh content and new perspectives getting a viewing by the fashion Establishment. A win-win, in other words.<br />
<br />
Kimmie Smith has been front-and-center during Fashion Week, <a href="http://kittenlounge.onsugar.com/NYFW-SS12-Lela-Rose-John-Lennon-Imagine-19038837" target="_hplink">reviewing the shows </a>for her readers (Kitten Lounge gets 20,000 hits from new fashion influentials a month). As a spokesperson for Sebago, a regular on HSN with ambassadorships with Crest 3D White and Mauboussin, Smith is doing fine on her own. So -- why <em>Cosmo</em>?<br />
<br />
<em>Cosmo</em>, no matter how you parse it, adds prestige to her already impressive resume. The <em>Cosmo</em> brand -- the iconic <a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/about/about-us_how-cosmo-changed-the-world" target="_hplink">Cosmo Girl</a>, so woven into the modern American narrative -- has never been, nor will ever be, irrelevant to modern culture. And therein lies the reciprocal exchange. David Karp of Tumblr, at last November's <a href="http://emediavitals.com/content/social-media-and-changing-digital-landscape" target="_hplink">Hearst Changing Media panel</a>, noted that he was interested in strengthening relationships with certain marquee legacy media entities -- like NPR -- particularly because they "still carry a certain weight." <br />
<br />
Not all legacy media brands have that weight. In the fashion world, however, <em>Cosmo</em> clearly matters. "Having the <em>Cosmo</em> nod is huge I love that they are all about the fun, fearless, female which I think is something that I embody in terms of my career path as well as what I would want to impart on other people."<br />
<br />
And, of course, that fondness has something to do with the fact that today's prominent fashion bloggers -- the increasingly influential<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2011/09/tavi_gevinson_explains_her_new.html" target="_hplink"> Tavi Gevinson</a>, for instance -- were influenced by the <em>Cosmos</em>, by the <em>Glamour</em>s and by the <em>Vogue</em>s. It is almost as if the "new" fashion hierarchy was paying a fashionable respect to legacy media, which paved the way and provided the contours of the social landscape that they now inhabit and direct. "Each recognition is such a humbling experience being someone from the Midwest who came here in 2002 and has worked within so many capacities in fashion," said Smith. "Cosmo is definitely a win-win; we add new voices and our personality and they bring in this phenomenal network of fans, brands and just having that history behind them!"<br />
<br />
Beyond the idealism there are also very earthy benefits to a blogger's exposure in a venue like Cosmo. "Blogging I have created a great platform," says Smith. "Cosmo noting and highlighting that is definitely a validation and opens me up to a much larger network which is always good for brands that I plan to work on in the future!"<br />
<br />
<br />
Finally, where does Kimmie see herself in ten years? "I see myself still being on the digital side as that has always been a part of my success. But the Kimmie Smith empire would have a lot more collaborative brands that I would have designed -- lip glosses, fragrances, leather goods etc. As an Accessories Expert I would love to have a super cute boutique that truly showcases brands that I believe in that are curated by me and of course having a few outposts in NYC, LA, Miami and Dubai. Of course continuing to do TV and spokeswork would be a part of it too."<br />
<br />
A Kimmie Smith empire, to be sure, that pays tribute to the<em> Vogue</em>s, the <em>Glamour</em>s and the <em>Cosmo</em>s.<br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:54:49 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>960233</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Will President Obama Be a One-Term President?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-president-obama-be-a_b_881561.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-president-obama-be-a_b_881561.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-president-obama-be-a_b_881561.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Obama is not a radical, he is -- and always has been -- a political moderate. It is not inconceivable that the way in which our presidential campaigns are presently structured makes it impossible for a "radical" -- at least a progressive radical -- to ever be elected to the highest office in the land. When was the last time we had a progressive president? JFK? He was a Cold Warrior to the hilt, an ardent defender of the military-industrial-complex. FDR? Maybe, but he had a Great War and a Great Depression allowing him to enact radical procedures. The fact that Obama is not a radical is perhaps why so many young progressives (and <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/23/stewart-saddened-by-obama/" target="_hplink">affable Comedy Central show hosts</a>) nowadays are so profoundly disappointed that the President didn't deliver on his "Hope" and "Change" promises. Their hearts were broken; they  <em>believed</em>. <br />
<br />
Nowhere is President Obama more moderate in his thinking than on foreign policy, his military policy to be precise. One might argue that Obama's foreign policy is somewhat neoconservative in nature. Libya, for example, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/against-the-current/86101/libya-war-obama-bush-neoconservative" target="_hplink">falls somewhere within </a>the nebulous liberal internationalist-neoconservative continuum; Obama approved a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/02/world/asia/02prexy.html" target="_hplink">30,000 troop Bush-ish surge</a> in Afghanistan; Obama <a href="http://www.cfr.org/cuba/obamas-guantanamo-shift/p24341" target="_hplink">tacked right on Guantanamo</a>. Obama has also kept Bush's Secretary of Defense -- Robert Gates -- for most of his first term in office, <a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/53165/" target="_hplink">creating a continuity</a> in America's military policy between the two presidencies, a particularly bitter thorn in the hearts of progressives. There are, curiously, very few short-term political advantages in creating this continuity. Neoconservatives will never -- ever -- accept a Barack Obama. And this continuity in American foreign policy with Bush, 43 greatly alienates liberal internationalists. And so, in essence, Obama is pursuing a military policy in which he gets next to zero political advantage -- not from isolationists, not from liberal internationalists, not from neoconservatives, and not even from many realists. Only some realists, those who believe that in the long-term historical perspective, would  such a continuity be considered wise. <br />
<br />
Is that Obama's true constituency? The CFR and the editors at <em>Foreign Affairs </em>magazine?<br />
<br />
<br />
This "moderation" in foreign policy could be politically fatal to Obama. Realism doesn't really have a political constituency in these United States. "Realpolitik," to most Americans, reeks of Bismark and Richelieu and Niccolo Machiavelli and, worse, <a href="http://www.sfsignal.com/mt-static/images/darthVader.jpg" target="_hplink">Darth Vader</a>. How many "realist"-based blogs, websites, think tanks, and  television shows are there in the United States -- and what are their numbers? The neocons have <em>Commentary</em> and <em>The Weekly Standard</em>, <em>the Wall Street Journal</em> Opinion page and, to a degree, Fox News; the liberal internationalists have -- after a fashion -- <em>The Nation </em>and MSNBC, and now, quite possibly, Current TV and sometimes <em>the New Republic</em> and a lot of the Op-Ed page of the <em>Times</em>. But where is the pro-realpolitik cable station in prime time? Where is the pro-Kissinger, pro-Brent Scowcroft journal of opinion? <em>Exactly</em>.<br />
<br />
Not in these United States. You see, America is an idealistic nation. <a href="http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/articles/2008-Spring/full-neocon.html" target="_hplink">Neoconservatism</a> and <a href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/04/01/liberal-internationalism-the-twilight-of-a-dream/" target="_hplink">liberal internationalism</a> both have deep philosophical roots in American history. Even isolationism -- idealistic in its pragmatism -- has roots in <a href="http://www.denbeste.nu/external/Mead01.html" target="_hplink">Andrew Jackson </a>and <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/past/politics/foreign/asiso.htm" target="_hplink">Taft</a>. But realism is viewed as something vaguely foreign, Old European, alien to the American organism. Kissinger, the well-traveled George Bush, and now Obama all have the taint of having seen the world at large and drawing pragmatic lessons that they use in dealing with it.<br />
<br />
<br />
Already we are seeing a <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/06/20/gop_isolationist_no_just_more_jacksonian.html" target="_hplink">growing isolationism</a> in the Republican party, much of it opportunist. It is only natural: Clinton -- flush with a budget surplus -- was a liberal internationalist; Bush was a relentless neocon; Obama -- with a vast deficit -- is a neocon-realist mix: next up -- isolationism! The Republican debate last week highlighted a seismic shift in foreign policy of the GOP, away from neoconservative adventurism. Perhaps that is why <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/167485-boehner-under-pressure-from-both-sides-on-libya" target="_hplink">"hawks" are pressuring</a> Speaker Bohner not to end America's involvement in our neoconnish-liberal internationalist war in Libya. The upcoming Libya vote in the House might just be a Rorschach test on the growing influence of isolationism in contemporary American politics.<br />
<br />
<br />
Now, the reports that Obama is going to move conservatively on reducing troop strength in Afghanistan. From <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2011/06/21/afghanistan-speech-preview/" target="_hplink">Joe Klein of <em>Time</em></a>:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"The slower departure sends a message to the Pakistanis-that we're not going to do what we did last time and bug out precipitously, leaving Afghanistan as a playing field in their Great Game against the Indians. It also gives the Afghan National Army more time to establish itself as a convincing anti-Taliban force. This is not a far-fetched proposition, by the way: the ANA is 90% non-Pashtun, a nearly-direct descendent of the old Northern Alliance that lost the civil war to the Taliban in the 1990s. (The various Taliban factions are almost entirely Pashtun.) My guess is that the ANA will be more than willing to continue that civil war after we go, and more than able to keep the country now that it has US equipment, training and logistical support (as opposed to the spotty Indian, Iranian and Russian support it received in the past).</blockquote><br />
<br />
Perfectly understandable and even politically wise. But disappointing nonetheless to those of us who ask: why are we in <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2011/06/21/afghanistan-speech-preview/" target="_hplink">the graveyard of empires</a>?<br />
<br />
<br />
If Obama resembles any recent American president in foreign policy, he calls to mind <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2008-03-29/news/29429114_1_foreign-policy-gop-ideas-obama" target="_hplink">Bush the elder</a>. Both Presidents respected the United Nations (and both believe in diplomacy), both presidents have seen the world and aggressively support world order, and both presidents believe in coalition-building and multilateralism when undertaking foreign adventures. Is that all they have in common?<br />
<br />
Bush was a one-termer, mainly because he focused on a moderate, realist foreign policy as the economy became a major  issue (sound familiar?). The economy became such an issue that Bush the welder's successor, Bill Clinton, kept the mantra "It's the Economy, Stupid." Sounds not unlike <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20070772-503544.html" target="_hplink">Romney, circa 2011</a>.<br />
<br />
Is a single term also the fate of our current president? To be well-remembered by the CFR and the editors of <em>Foreign Affairs </em>and the American Historians of the Future, but unburied and unsung in the political present?<br />
<br />
At present that appears to be the case.]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:09:19 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>881561</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Anthony Weiner Should Sign on With Current TV]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/weiner-resigns_b_877814.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/weiner-resigns_b_877814.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/weiner-resigns_b_877814.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[For someone who is so astonishingly good at making <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJlP_QpgI_k" target="_hplink">viral media magic</a>, Congressman Weiner profoundly misread the social media tea leaves. Congressman Anthony Weiner should probably resign right about now, for the sake of his party, which is facing an uphill battle in the House next year. He&amp;nbsp; might want to consider a career in the budding field of <em>opinion journalism</em>, a job that has made his arch-nemesis Andrew Breitbart quite powerful. Weiner's profound misreading on the uses of social media -- as well as <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/06/weiner_lies" target="_hplink">lying outright</a> on his Old Media "I was hacked" tour -- have left him in an untenable political position, more laughingstock than legislator. Time to move on, Anthony.<br />
<br />
Gawker and just about everyone else in the digital gossip business right about now is hammering the hapless Congressman online. And why not? This scandal equals page views! Even Colbert and Stewart roughed him up (Colbert, though, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/stephen-colbert-weiners-sadly-delicious-sordid-saga-proves-dems-dont-share-gop-values/" target="_hplink">much more so</a>). Nancy Pelosi -- once the staunchest of political allies -- cannot help but gang up on Weiner, as she promised when Democrats took the House in 2006 the most open, honest and ethical Congress in history. Minority Leader Pelosi this week <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20069465-503544.html" target="_hplink">called for an ethics probe</a> of Congressman Weiner yesterday. The writing is on the wall.<br />
<br />
Weiner's lies have alienated him from his erstwile allies. Many progressives defended the Congressman on the grounds that he said that he had been hacked, had been "pranked." That, we now know, was a lie. And many of those erstwhile allies in the blogosphere, betrayed, are now ice-cold to his weepy entreaties that he be allowed to stay in office. Further, Weiner overshadowed a great victory in New York's 26th District. <br />
<br />
"Right now the party is trying to promote the recent victory of Democrat Kathy Hochul in a special election in New York's 26th congressional district as emblematic of a Democratic recovery from the debacle of the 2010 midterms," says the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0607/Congressman-Anthony-Weiner-Why-Democrats-are-extra-mad-at-him" target="_hplink"><em>Christian Science Monitor</em>'s</a> Peter Grier. "That's the news that leads the DCCC's web site, for example. Hochul's win is supposed to show how concerns about the future of Medicare might doom Republicans in swing districts. But with the eruption of Weiner's troubles, cable news is spending a lot less time on Medicare."<br />
<br />
It seems hard to imagine Anthony Weiner surviving this politically. Even <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/06/anthony-weiner-survival-chances-slim-insiders-experts_n_872188.html?ir=New%20York" target="_hplink">insiders</a> see his chances as slim. Further, there is the matter of <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/politics/redistricting-weiner-stands-out-among-likely-mayoral-candidates?utm_medium=partial-text&amp;utm_campaign=politics" target="_hplink">redistricting in New York</a>, where two seats as a result of census results will evaporate. It is not inconceivable that Weiner's relative political weakness could result in his seat -- which straddles Brooklyn and Queens -- going <a href="http://www.commonblog.com/2011/06/07/redistricting-could-roast-rep-weiner/" target="_hplink">the way of the dodo</a>. If that were to happen -- if both Brooklyn and Queens lost a seat because of his social media tomfoolery -- he would NEVER become the next<br />
Mayor of New York (his default position). He would become, instead, an infamous figure in two of the five boroughs. In other words, it is looking increasingly likely that Weiner's political career is over.<br />
<br />
What next? The Spitzer Path?<br />
<br />
If indeed the Congressman's political career is over -- what next? <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/fashion/08Spitzer.html" target="_hplink">The Elliot Spitzer Media Route</a> (tm) appears to be the smartest way to go. Spitzer, who resigned from office because of a sex scandal far worse than Weiner's, has reinvented himself as an effective foil against the right on CNN. Further, he may or may not have found enough redemption to run for Mayor of New York -- the job Weiner covets more than anything in the world. Being a talking head and following the Spitzer path may just be Weiner's way to redemption and a future successful Mayoral run.<br />
<br />
If Congressman Weiner were to go the Spitzer route the next question would be -- which network? Clearly, he would have to go the cable route, like Spitzer. But Elliot has CNN, he is the big cat in the jungle over there. And <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/07/rachel-maddow-anthony-weiner-sex-scandal-chart_n_872352.html" target="_hplink">Rachel Maddow's scathing attack</a> -- the Post-Bill Clinton Modern American Political Sex Scandal Consequence-O-Meter, anyone? -- suggests that Weiner may not be welcome at MSNBC. Ratings wise we cannot fail to note that Maddow is <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/tag/rachel-maddow-show-ratings/" target="_hplink">the big cat in the jungle</a> at MSNBC.<br />
<br />
So what option does that leave for Weiner?<br />
<br />
<strong>Current TV</strong><br />
<br />
Although Current TV is only available in 60 million homes, an explosive hire like Anthony Weiner would be great publicity, especially on the cusp on Keith Olbermann's new show. It's really a no brainer.<br />
<br />
Al Gore's network, which averages just 23,000 viewers in prime time each night, is in the process of reinvention. And it appears that Current TV doesn't have a problem with hiring "<a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/06/07/136931640/keith-olbermann-the-countdown-to-his-new-show" target="_hplink">bad boys</a>" with a checkered past but strong opinions. And it is lucrative: Olbermann -- who makes his debut on June 20th -- is making as much as <a href="http://edit.hollywoodreporter.com/news/keith-olbermann-breaks-silence-msnbc-195404" target="_hplink">$10 million a year</a>. If Weiner made even a nice part of that it would be an attractive step up from his Congressional pay of $174,000, enough perhaps of soothing the sting of a thwarted political career.<br />
<br />
Ironically, Weiner might be able to get a measure of revenge if he -- and of course this is all speculation -- were programmed against Rachel Maddow (Keith Olbermann competes directly against his own old slot). Revenge, to paraphrase Khan, is a dish best served cold.<br />
<br />
<strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
<br />
Anthony Weiner, if he thinks more about the Democratic Party than his own political ambitions, should resign his seat. It really is over, and he ought to see the writing on the wall. Tenaciousness might actually hurt the party in the 2012 elections if the GOP decides to make him a poster boy of Democrat excesses. And it is nearly impossible to imagine a scenario in which the Republicans don't hammer him and his party and using this scandal as a major issue in increasing their gains in the House in the next election cycle (snuffing the Medicare issue).<br />
<br />
Current TV, remaking itself as a freewheeling non-corporate progressive cabler, is the perfect fallback for Weiner to play to his strengths as a combative and partisan fighter. No one in the House of Representatives was better than Weiner at creating viral video moments out of his TV appearances. Perhaps it is time to put the House behind him and put those talents to use not as a legislator but as an "opinion journalist."]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:02:00 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>877814</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[RIP Robert Novak]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/rip-robert-novak_b_262229.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/rip-robert-novak_b_262229.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/rip-robert-novak_b_262229.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[<strong>Robert Novak</strong> was a sour man. He had a fixation on three-piece suits and capital gains tax cuts. Novak often spat when he talked. He must have been thoroughly unpleasant company if you did not agree with him philosophically. These factors made him ripe for satire. Robert Novak looked and acted like <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2005/07/i-novak-image-via-cnn-wouldnt-robert.html">a Dickensian villain</a> come to life. But there was more to him. Robert Novak, despite the high quotient of funny that he brought to any conversation, was not evil. He was, I believe, a good, if misguided man.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nysun.com/national/prince-of-darkness-chronicles-novaks-life/58362/">The Prince of Darkness</a> lacked a natural empathy at the outset for the poor, the weakest members of the human society. It is not inconceivable that the virtues that make a good Republican -- that go-go competitive edge, the high productiveness, the aggression -- they come at the expense of human empathy and compassion. Could that be why <strong>George W. Bush</strong> -- a born-again Christian -- touted, often, a "compassionate conservatism" on the campaign trail and throughout his Presidency? Did he intuit that robust libertarianism is as imbalanced, philosophically, as the liberty crushing, ultra-egalitarianism of the left? I believe so. Novak, aware of that natural weakness in his personality, never tired of seeking a more harmonious sense of being. That, I think, is what made Novak ultimately a good man. He was aware of his deficiencies, and he worked to correct them. How many people at that age work to change their lives? Late in his life, Novak became a Roman Catholic. That, I think, is in itself an heroic gesture. Most people stop growing -- or stop giving a damn about growing -- after middle age. The sour, disharmonious souls who scream -- pink faced -- at Town Hall meetings are a testament to that sad truism.<br />
<br />
But Robert Novak was different. Through his discovery of Roman Catholicism, Robert Novak tried to offset his natural sourness towards the weak and society's less fortunate. This from <a href="http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=24964">CatholicOnline</a>, on his conversion process:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"A friend gave Novak Catholic literature after he came close to dying from spinal meningitis in the early 1980s. About a decade later, the columnist's wife, Geraldine, also not a Catholic, persuaded him to join her at Mass at St. Patrick's Catholic Church in Washington. The celebrant was a former source of Novak's. <br />
<br />
<br />
"Father Peter Vaghi, now Msgr. Vaghi and pastor of the Church of the Little Flower in Bethesda, Md., was a former Republican lawyer and adviser to Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M. He had been a source for the Evans and Novak column that Novak wrote with Rowland Evans. <br />
<br />
"Novak started to go to Mass regularly, but it wasn't until a few years later that he decided to convert to Catholicism. The turning point, as he recounts in his book, happened when he went to Syracuse University in New York to give a lecture. Before he spoke, he was seated at a dinner table near a young woman who was wearing a necklace with a cross. Novak asked her if she was Catholic, and she posed the same question to him. <br />
<br />
"Novak replied that he had been going to Mass each Sunday for the last four years, but that he had not converted. <br />
<br />
"Her response -- 'Mr. Novak, life is short, but eternity is forever' -- motivated him to start the process of becoming a Catholic through the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults. He was baptized at St. Patrick's Church in 1998. His wife was also baptized a Catholic."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Catholicism added a missing dimension to Novak's personality. It lifted him beyond a hard materialism that, in his case, made him an almost comically cruel political commentator. That sense of metaphysics led him to work with fellow "bleeding heart conservative" Jack Kemp on a rather strange -- but politically interesting -- collaboration to <a href="http://www.salon.com/march97/news/news2970320.html">bring Louis Farrakhan's fringe group of disenfranchised Americans into the Republican party</a>. Catholicism clearly worked a miracle in making Bob Novak care about poor African-Americans.<br />
<br />
One cannot memorialize the life of Robert Novak without noting that he was a tremendous reporter. His scoops were legendary. Especially during Republican administrations -- Reagan's, in particular -- his inside information and contacts were second to none. To be sure, Novak's column was used by Republican administration officials with an agenda. But like any good journalist, Novak tried to provide context. This blog quoted his column often and we will miss the extremely inside information that he brought to light. <br />
<br />
I am not a religious man, so I will not attempt to predict the future of Novak. But here, on this planet, his legacy will be that of a solid journalist, an interesting human being, a searcher after the Truth, a man who tried to be compassionate -- even though it was not a natural component of his personality -- and an advocate for growth and wealth. <br />
<br />
May he rest in peace.<br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:54:34 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>262229</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Ron Kuby's Jailhouse Advice to Bernie Madoff]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/ron-kubys-jailhouse-advic_b_186766.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/ron-kubys-jailhouse-advic_b_186766.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/ron-kubys-jailhouse-advic_b_186766.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Air America radio host and attorney <a href="http://airamerica.com/doingtime">Ron Kuby</a> had some advice for Ponz scum <strong>Bernie Madoff</strong> on his upcoming and personal "moist <a href="http://cosmodromemag.com/files/oz.jpg">Oz-like</a> scenario." We, <em>too</em>, have advice: get into solitary confinement, <em>schnell</em>! And stay away from the Nigerian with <a href="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y70/dangerousd357/oz-season3-adebisi.jpg">the little hat</a>! <a href="http://www.kubylaw.com/">Kuby's office</a> has represented individuals accused of bombing the World Trade Center; <strong>Colin Ferguson</strong>, the Long Island Railroad gunman; and, among others, the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club.<br />
<br />
<center><embed id="listen-mp3-player" class="audio" src="http://airamerica.com/mediaplayer.swf" width="300" height="15" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="enablejs=true&amp;width=300&amp;height=15&amp;autostart=false&amp;file=http://airamerica.com/ondemand/play/99583.mp3" style="display: block;" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /></center><br />
<br />
"The first piece of advice," said Kuby on his syndicated program, is that "prison is designed to be arbitrary...you have to live with the arbitrary system of the penal code. Period."<br />
<br />
Kuby continued: "Whatever you were before...<em>changes</em>...most of your reputation [depends on] how you handle yourself in prison." Kuby, who has defended some highly controversial people and seen them as an attorney after some time behind bars, does allow that Madoff could conceivably buy a crew for protection. "I think that he may [be able to buy respect]," Kuby said later.<br />
<br />
Kuby went further, "You gotta remember: respect." <em>Respect</em> in prison is key, said Kuby, illustrating that concept with an analogy about how getting up from table and having another man's tush at eye-level -- in civilized society -- might be dismissed with an apology, but could be a far more <em>serious</em> matter in the pokey. <br />
<br />
"Hit the weights," Kuby concluded, "get into the weight room, work out."]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:25:00 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>186766</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Should John McLaughlin Retire?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/should-john-mclaughlin-re_b_183538.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/should-john-mclaughlin-re_b_183538.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/should-john-mclaughlin-re_b_183538.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[<br />
82-year old television host <strong>John McLaughlin</strong> appeared particularly off his political game this week. He stumbled, mistaking <em>The Economist</em> for an FT magazine to a puzzled-looking FT editor and panelist <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2352198/">Chrystia Freeland</a>. And there were many other verbal missteps, gaffes and woozy stumbles on the half-hour <a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,312130,00.html">McLaughlin Group</a>, which launched in 1982.<br />
<br />
As someone who has watched <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/chuck-klostermans-america/mclaughlin-0308">the show</a> off and on -- attending college was the biggest viewing interruption -- for the better part of 20 years (we remember <a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4363652.html">Jack Germond</a>), McLaughlin seemed completely thrown. <em>Granted</em>, anyone can have <a href="http://mediamatters.org/action_center/mclaughlin/">an off day</a>. And, at 82 the man is perfectly entitled to a benign <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/BUZZSAW_Free_Rex_Reed/311964">senior moment</a> of two. But on the show this week the former Jesuit priest seemed what can only be properly construed as "confused." Should the political host throw in the towel? Is it time for the former Nixon speechwriter to enjoy the fruits of his <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2008/11/john-mclaughlin-my-production-company.html">Oliver production company</a> and pass the reins to someone else more lucid?<br />
<br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:36:22 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>183538</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Mika On Stahl Interview: I Love CBS, The Firing Process Was Ugly]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/mika-on-stahl-interview-i_b_168017.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/mika-on-stahl-interview-i_b_168017.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/mika-on-stahl-interview-i_b_168017.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[On February 17 <strong>Mika Brzezinski</strong> spoke on the radio show she shares with <strong>Joe Scarborough</strong> of <a href="http://www.wowowow.com/post/mika-brzezinski-lesley-stahl-msnbc-joe-scarborough-cbs-210120?hp=210120">the headline</a> on her interview with <strong>Leslie Stahl</strong> at WowoWow "Mika Brzezinski Tells Lesley Stahl: My Departure From CBS Was Pretty Ugly." Of the headline, Brzezinski said during the radio show: "I love CBS.(The firing) was an ugly process. But the headline? Oh, boy." Mika has not been shy about <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/21/AR2008122102266.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns">her break with CBS,</a> but seemed to hint that the wording of "ugly" didn't quite capture what she wanted to say about her time at the eye network (although she did also use that word in the interview).<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2009/02/rush-limbaugh-gets-brzezinski.html">Also on the show</a>, her father, former Carter administration National Security Advisor <strong>Zbigniew Brzezinski</strong>, defended himself against Rush Limbaugh's recent radio attacks on his advocating of a voluntary national solidarity fund for people who benefited from the bubble to excess for disadvantaged Americans hurting economically. <br />
<br />
Still later, fixed on the tantalizing headline, <strong>Mika Brzezinski</strong> added: "<em>Ruh-oh</em>, I'm in trouble, I'm in big trouble." ]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:22:21 EST</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>168017</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Chuck Todd: Rahm And Howard Dean Are Alpha Males, Don't Get Along]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/chuck-todd-rahm-and-howar_b_165559.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/chuck-todd-rahm-and-howar_b_165559.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/chuck-todd-rahm-and-howar_b_165559.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[NBC News Political Director <a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1872167,00.html">Chuck Todd</a>, the so-called goateed guru of politics was on C-Span's <a href="http://www.c-span.org/Watch/watch.aspx?MediaId=HP-A-15263"><em>Washington Journal</em> Sunday</a> morning ahead of the talking head shows. He was, as usual, informative (why did the NBC suits give the MTP slot to <strong>David Gregory</strong>?). He spoke about <strong>Howard Dean</strong>, whom a caller mentioned as a good possible choice to head HHS <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/02/obama_takes_the.html">after Daschle crashed and burned</a>. Todd informed the viewers that Obama made the announcement of <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/01/obama-kaine-1.html">Tim Kaine</a> to replace Dean at the DNC when "(Dean) was not in the country." The insider DC gossip continued, as Todd noted that the difficulties between the Obama administration and Dean, who, arguably, helped Obama win with his 50-state strategy, may lie in <strong>Rahm Emmanuel</strong>, the administration's chief of staff. "I have a feeling that <strong>Rahm Emanuel</strong> and <strong>Howard Dean</strong> have similar personalities," Todd explained, "let's call them alpha males and leave it at that." <br />
<br />
<strong>Chuck Todd</strong> also explained what he tries to bring to NBC via his reporting. "I'm trying to ask the kitchen table question, the question my mom and grandmother want to know." That journalistic philosophy is similar to that of Todd's mentor, the late <strong>Tim Russert</strong>. In an excerpt from his book <em>Big Russ and Me</em> on the <em>Reader's Digest</em> <a href="http://www.rd.com/your-america-inspiring-people-and-stories/tim-russert-gets-lessons-from-his-father/article27662.html">web site</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>On Saturday I called Dad: 'I'm going to be on <em>Meet the Press</em> tomorrow. Any advice?" <br />
<br />
'Pretend you're talking to me,' Big Russ said. 'Don't get too fancy. Don't talk that Washington talk. Ask questions that my buddies at the legion hall would want to know about.' It was good counsel and, as usual, I took it.</blockquote> <br />
<em><br />
More <a href="http://www.rd.com/your-america-inspiring-people-and-stories/tim-russert-gets-lessons-from-his-father/article27662.html">here</a>.</em><br />
<br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:49:17 EST</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>165559</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Is This The End Of The "Tough Guy" President?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/is-this-the-end-of-the-to_b_135673.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/is-this-the-end-of-the-to_b_135673.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/is-this-the-end-of-the-to_b_135673.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[We've come to expect a certain amount of raw "manliness" from our American Presidents, but George W. Bush may have been the straw that broke the proverbially camel's back on the importance of that particular skillset. What is a President if he -- and invariably it has always been a he (averted gaze) -- cannot crack a <a href="http://static.flickr.com/97/212836478_dfd407cfce.jpg">Macadamia nut </a>'tween his forefinger and thumb? Previous to "<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images/bushonlincoln-mission-accomplished.gif">Dubya</a>," Presidents from George Washington, who excelled in the manly arts of <a href="http://www.mccordclan.com/George201782%20painting.jpg">colt-breaking</a> and wrestling to the <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/11/07/051107crat_atlarge">rail-splitting Lincoln</a> were expected to be manly men. They had what I like to call "<a href="http://members.tripod.com/~CARIART/Andrew_Jackson.jpg">the rib-busting ox-strength</a>." Reagan, after his fashion, ostentatiously <a href="http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/large/c6640-4A.jpg">cleared brush</a>. And <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/boldtype/0501/vidal/essay_us.html">Teddy Roosevelt best of all </a>understood Power and exercised it <a href="http://www.smplanet.com/imperialism/joining.html">at every opportunity.</a><br />
<br />
There has been, though, quite a bit of <em>excessive</em> "<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12041">Thumos</a>" in the air, especially after September 11th when we became increasingly <a href="http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/TypeSix.asp">security-oriented</a> as a people. Lately the testosteronal stink in the musky gladitorial fundament that is politics has become thoroughly obnoxious. Just before the economic crisis where Bush became a "<a href="http://members.tripod.com/~CARIART/Andrew_Jackson.jpg">Born Again Multilateralist," </a>even serene Canada was getting rankled by America's raw aggression. And aggression is like a virus, it spreads: just ask any abused child. Vladimir Putin's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/world/europe/08putin.html?ref=europe">instructional martial arts video</a>, for example. Come on now. How about McCain's <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5imPCowM4jR7m4MSsdSrFnUMc8ZHQ">hissing rage</a>, calling Obama "<em>that one</em>!" Then there is the case of those unregulated financial schemes <a href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Ga8DI0sYL._SL500_.jpg">devised by the greedy</a>, unravelling into disastrous messes picked up by the taxpayer. The world's muscles are coiled like a jungle cat, and its fists are balled, knuckles screaming white, into adamantine knots <em>waiting for the big</em>... Let's all simmer down for a moment. Take robust, deep cleansing breaths.<br />
<br />
Things are overheated, to be sure. Now, in this hour of national exigency, these shameful McCain/Palin rallies, where fearless followers, nestled in the crowd of their "brothers," are actually shouting things like: "Kill him!" -- well, this over-masculine overcompensation for the fears and insecurities of 9/11 has reached its logical conclusion. The testosterone party is over. Finally. And not a moment too soon.<br />
<br />
Ta-Nehisi Coates recently wrote with passion in <a href="http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/beef_is_not_what_jay_said_to_nas.php#comments">The <i>Atlantic</i></a> about the temperature at McCain rallies, and how the Senator from Arizona failed to mention the so-called Ayers connection at the debates but was voluminous on the subject on the stump:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Frankly, I've always believed that the quickest way to show you're a chump is to run around telling everyone about that aren't one. You want to prove to the American people that you aren't shook? Don't talk them to death. Get in the ring and kick the other guys ass. It's that simple. Screw all this talk about who's tougher than who. Here is what I know: McCain will talk that shit about Ayers and brag about taking the gloves off. He will send his wife and Sarah Palin out to do his dirty work. But when faced with the man who he believes 'pals around with terrorist' he played his position."</blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
I, too, have never cottoned to people needing to tell me how big and tough they were or are. Real tough guys don't go in for that, anyway. It goes without saying. <a href="http://www.booknotes.org/Program/?ProgramID=1693">Chimpanzee-logic</a>. That whole Us-versus-Them -- "they are either for us or their against us" world view of Manichianism suggests naught else but a simple mind riddled with crippling insecurities. And there is always an appeal to collective, demogogic action. Real tough guys don't act in concert with a committee. It seems to me that it is not so much cowardice, although that is a factor in their huddling together collectively to act aggressively, so much as a cacophonous insecurity that these types reek of when they feel the need to talk about their toughness and threaten "the rough stuff" -- whatever that is -- <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/10/10377_reporter_assaulted_palin_rally.html">at any<br />
opportunity</a>, always collectively.<br />
<br />
Mankind is at its rawest when we are insecure about our ability to make a living, secure our housing, or provide for our future. This is the <i>worst</i> time for the McCain/Palin ticket to be stoking the fires, blowing on the embers, playing with primitive tools, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0817-13.htm">connecting with the limbic brain</a> of voters. The late Senator <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,437570,00.html">Daniel Patrick Moynihan</a> -- a man who's toughness served his intellect and not the other way round -- called this scurrilous, low grade strategy "<a href="http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/004343.html">boob bait for Bubba</a>." How right he was.<br />
<br />
There has been far too much Thumos, far too much aggressive hypermasculine stupidity, on display in these United States of America in these past seven and a half years. Obama's steady hand and inner calm, we believe, are making such a splash on the psychology of American voters in the closing days of this campaign because the people are is sick of all this "tough guy" stupidity. Even the house conservative of the <i>New York Times</i> David Brooks agrees, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">opining</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"There has never been a moment when, at least in public, (Obama) seems gripped by inner turmoil. It's not willpower or self-discipline he shows as much as an organized unconscious. Through some deep, bottom-up process, he has developed strategies for equanimity, and now he's become a homeostasis machine.<br />
<br />
<br />
"When Bob Schieffer asked him tough questions during the debate Wednesday night, he would step back and describe the broader situation. When John McCain would hit him with some critique -- even about fetuses being left to die on a table -- he would smile in amusement at the political game they were playing. At every challenging moment, his instinct was to self-remove and establish an observer's perspective.<br />
<br />
"Through the debate, he was reassuring and self-composed. McCain, an experienced old hand, would blink furiously over the tension of the moment, but Obama didn't reveal even unconscious signs of nervousness. There was no hint of an unwanted feeling."</blockquote><br />
<br />
America is looking for another type of President, one that is a multidimensional thinker, a multilateralist, flexible, able to admit his or her error, self-examined, intellectual and serious about the myriad problems facing America. The days of the <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-09/john-mccain-shooting-craps-pissed-off/">tough-talking gambler</a> are over. In many ways, the new sort of President is a type that this country has never quite had before. Then again, the problems facing America's future because we have let the ship of State be commandeered by the "Tough Guy" type are a set of issues -- domestically and internationally -- that the country has never had to deal with before as well. <br />
<br />
God bless America.]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:28:59 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>135673</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Did Uganda Have a Space Program, or is Robert Kimball a Fool?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/did-uganda-have-a-space-p_b_130954.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/did-uganda-have-a-space-p_b_130954.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/did-uganda-have-a-space-p_b_130954.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Did Uganda have a space program? As someone born in the country during the tyranny of Idi Amin, I cannot put anything beyond <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-mwangaguhunga073103.asp">Idi Amin's Daffy Duck logic</a>, but I cannot remember any "Space Program." The so-called "Last King of Scotland, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea" had more - how does one say this? -- <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2005/08/african-dictator-chic-as-immigrant.html">terrestrial ambitions</a> (Averted Gaze). I ask because <a href="http://www.newcriterion.com/posts.cfm/england-expects-every-man-to-be-3930">ardent anti-multiculturalist Robert Kimball</a> spoke on the subject by way of responding to the Nobel Prize Committee's slamming of American Literature (And what Uganda's *alleged* space program has to do with the Nobel Prize escapes me entirely). From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/oct/01/nobelprize.usa"><em>The Guardian</em></a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Sorry, John Updike. Don't get your hopes up, Joyce Carol Oates. And Philip Roth, what were you thinking? It's been 15 long years since an American author was last honoured with a Nobel prize for literature. <br />
<br />
Judging by the low opinion the head of the award jury holds of American writing, it is not going to happen this year."<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
Robert Kimball, the editor of <em>The New Criterion</em>, registered (Nobel Literature Committee judge Horace) Engdahl's comments with a degree of detachment. He noted that the other Nobel committees are due to announce their prizes next week, in medicine, peace and economics, and that Engdahl may have been trying to generate some advance publicity. <br />
<br />
The committee on literature by convention gives only 48 hours notice of its announcement.<br />
<br />
'It reminds me a little bit of the Apollo space programme that Uganda instituted under the rule of Idi Amin where they had rockets and so on except that they were made out of balsa wood,' he said."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Did Robert Kimball -- who loves the Great Books of Western Civilization -- just journey into <a href="http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/conrad.html"><em>The Heart of Darkness</em></a>? Was there a Ugandan Space Program? There is no online evidence that I can find, and the whole thing sounds kind of dodgy. We recall the infamous "Zambian Space Program," which was covered with racist glee on October 30, 1964 by <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,876312-2,00.html"><em>Time</em> magazine</a> thusly:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"During the independence festivities only one noted Zambian failed to share in all the harmony. He is Edward Mukuka Nkoloso, a grade-school science teacher and the director of Zambia's National Academy of Science, Space Research and Philosophy, who claimed the goings-on interfered with his space program to beat the U.S. and the Soviet Union to the moon. Already Nkoloso is training twelve Zambian astronauts, including a curvaceous 16-year-old girl, by spinning them around a tree in an oil drum and teaching them to walk on their hands, 'the only way humans can walk on the moon.'" </blockquote><br />
<br />
<em>Charmed</em>, I'm sure.]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:40:56 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>130954</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Will Putin Influence the 2008 Election?]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-putin-influence-the_b_123970.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-putin-influence-the_b_123970.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/will-putin-influence-the_b_123970.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[Wouldn't you have liked to have been a fly on the wall during the conversation at the Beijing Olympics between Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Bush? While the specifics of the conversation remains tightly held between the two world leaders, Australian Prime Minister<a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1687075,00.html"> Kevin Rudd</a> gave a rough outline on what he overheard to <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/beijing_olympics/story/0,27313,24156469-5014197,00.html">The Australian</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Mr. Rudd revealed in an interview with Beijing Now in Beijing on Saturday that he was sitting just two rows behind Mr. Bush when an 'animated' discussion between he and Mr. Putin broke out over Russia's advance into South Ossetia, a breakaway region in neighbouring Georgia.<br />
<br />
'The President and Mr. Putin were in animated conversation two seats in front of us and I imagine they had a few things on their agenda,' Mr. Rudd said.<br />
<br />
Mr. Rudd said that Mr. Bush appeared to be making a strong point to the Russian Prime Minister, even as the world's elite athletes filed into Beijing's Bird's Nest stadium."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Clearly Putin timed his nation's incursion into Georgia to coincide with the Olympics in Beijing. It was as if Putin were saying, "Not only is this the day of China's 'coming out' as a superpower. It is also the day that Russia takes its rightful place on the world's stage as well." From <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4499726.ece">Timesonline</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"In Beijing, Mr. Putin was able to talk directly to another Olympic visitor - President Bush - and still found time to pay Russian athletes a morale-boosting visit. Then he flew straight to Vladikavkaz, across the border from South Ossetia, to meet tearful refugees. Both moments received ample coverage on the country's television evening news, adding to the impression of the former President as an indefatigable action hero."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Putin, in a previous, less bellicose incarnation, loomed not so large on the Bush event horizon. <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2005/02/kissinger-putin-part-deux-corsair-is.html">Kissinger</a> shrewdly pegged Putin on a recent <em>Charlie Rose Show</em> as someone who saw himself in the mold of <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2008/03/kissinger-putin-would-like-to-go-down.html">Peter the Great</a>. But the Russian Prime Minister's ambitions not long ago were smaller. Those ambitions were previously tied to St. Petersburg. Who can forget the almost sad but memorable portrait painted by Bob Woodward of Putin, Spaniel-like, trying to persuade President Bush to attend the 300th anniversary of his hometown. Couldn't the American President have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/opinion/30sat3.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">looked into his eyes</a> and discerned the earnestness of his request and the consequences of continued humiliations? From Bob Woodward's <em><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=R3brydgkbg0C&amp;pg=PA372&amp;lpg=PA372&amp;dq=putin+bush+st+petersburg+anniversary+woodward&amp;source=web&amp;ots=NtuwQP9ewk&amp;sig=xl0P4mYb-D7Dmh9h5gBUvPfwMyQ&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=result">Plan of Attack</a></em>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Putin pushed Bush on whether he would attend the summit scheduled in St. Petersburg, which is Putin's hometown, for the city's 300th anniversary.'I certainly hope I can make it,' Bush said somewhat coyly."</blockquote><br />
<br />
The pendulum swings. Certainly Putin in his present incarnation would merit more than a coy non-committal response from America's President. As it often is with the gut-level instinctual politics of the Bushies, Strength begets "Respect" (for further reference see: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/02/14/btsc.florcruz/index.html">Kim Jong-Il</a>). That "Strength-Begets-Respect" approach to the international theater is not lost on <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGUPH1VLn.7c&amp;refer=home">Achmadinejad's Iran</a>, which is tying up <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071900154.html">the Quartet </a>diplomatically in their mad dash for The Bomb (also known as: Instant Respect). While Bush <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030601-2.html">did make</a> the St. Petersburg anniversary, Bush's foreign policy vis-a-vis Russia was of humiliation to the Kremlin. One could make a strong argument that that wasn't the impression Washington wanted to leave, nonetheless that is how Moscow read the Orange and Rose Revolutions, the official <a href="http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-english/2008/February/20080218144244dmslahrellek0.9832117.html">recognition of Kosovo</a>, and <a href="http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080123/97602111.html">the encirclement of NATO</a>. <br />
<br />
Future American administrations will have to deal with this new <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3426">petropolitically-fuelled</a>, choleric Russia. One would have expected an old Russia hand like <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jKGyvl-wPdH2pItbNf_eGOGEWdkw">Condi Rice</a>  to have anticipated <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/12/world/europe/12putin.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">the blowback</a>. Finally, the U.S. sponsorship of Georgia's bid to join NATO was the straw that broke the Russian Bear's back. From then on it was a matter of honor for the man from St. Petersburg.<br />
<br />
That brings us to the title of this post: Will Russia Influence The 2008 Election? Already Putin has had <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/JI04Ag01.html">an undue influence</a> on the choice of Obama's running mate. The timing of Russia's Georgia incursion gave urgency to Senator Obama's choice of Senate Foreign Policy Committee Chairman Joe Biden even as the international turbulence strengthened Senator McCain's argument of experience. Moreover, Putin injected himself directly into the US Presidential campaign at the end of August. From <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1838305,00.html">Time</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"In an interview with CNN last week, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin accused the U.S. of orchestrating the war in Georgia in order to benefit the candidacy of John McCain. He claimed that 'U.S. citizens were indeed in the area of conflict' and that 'the only one who can give such orders is their leader.' Without endorsing Putin's claim, many European officials reportedly do harbor suspicions that there was more American involvement in the crisis than previously reported."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Add to this intrigue the fact that the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, skipped his own party's nominating convention to make <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122051771846298917.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">an overseas trip</a> into Putin's backyard. Touring a U.S. C-17 military cargo plane at Tbilisi's military airport with Georgian President <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199097/">Mikheil Saakashvili</a>, Cheney was making a less-than-subtle show of American force in the region. <br />
<br />
Even the Republican Party talking points remind us of the fact that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin shares a border with Russia. Former US Ambassador <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120400313.html">John Bolton</a>, often a surrogate for Cheney's point of view, <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/1141722,CST-NWS-sneed03.article">said of Palin</a>, "She's been a hunter since birth. I just saw a picture of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin shooting a tiger <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94223446">with a tranquilizer gun</a>. It would be hardy competition between Putin and our next vice president [Palin]." <br />
<br />
Already Russia has had a curious influence on the American election of 2008. And something tells me we have not yet seen the full extent of Russia's influence stateside.<br />
]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:59:42 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>123970</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[Bill Clinton Still Won't Speak To Bill Richardson]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/bill-clinton-still-wont-s_b_122066.html]]></link>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/bill-clinton-still-wont-s_b_122066.html]]></guid>
<comments><![CDATA[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-mwangaguhunga/bill-clinton-still-wont-s_b_122066.html#comments]]></comments>
<description><![CDATA[CBS' <strong>Bob Schieffer,</strong> talking about the historic nature of this Democrat National Convention to African-Americans on the Imus in the Morning Show, relayed an interesting tidbit about <a href="http://ronmwangaguhunga.blogspot.com/2007/09/glorious-bill-richardson-no-one-baby.html">Bill Richardson</a> and his former boss, <strong>Bill Clinton</strong>. You will recall that the 42nd President -- via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/22/carville-compares-richard_n_92894.html">surrogate James Carville</a> -- let his feelings be known about Bill Richardson's endorsement of <strong>Barack Obama</strong> as well as the former Ambassador's <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/03/obama-will-get-richardsons-second-choice-votes/">releasing of his Iowa delegates</a> to Obama, helping fuel his upset victory in the Hawkeye State over Clinton and John Edwards. The Clintonites viewed it as a betrayal of Biblical lengths, as Bill himself <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=4233478">had been lobbying hard</a> to get the New Mexico Governor's imprimatur (They watched this year's Superbowl together). Bill Richardson, the Clintonistas felt, owed Bill Clinton a lot considering his rapid career ascent in the Clinton administration. <br />
<br />
Richardson's speech was cut from last night's Convention broadcast. Schieffer, who saw him last night afterwards said the Governor told him that he and Senator Clinton are "fine." Richardson recently hosted a fundraiser for Hillary to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/hillary-clint-6.html">retire her remaining campaign debt</a>. But Bill Clinton, Richardson added, still won't speak to the former Commerce Secretary.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p><p><em><strong>For more Huffington Post coverage of the Democratic National Convention, visit our <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/">Politics @ the DNC page</a>, our <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/democratic-convention">Democratic Convention Big News Page</a>, and our <a href="http://twitter.com/huffpost">HuffPost bloggers' Twitter feed</a>, live from Denver.</strong></em><p><p>]]></description>
<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:57:18 EDT</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>122066</dc:identifier>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Mwangaguhunga]]></dc:creator>
</item></channel></rss>